[bitcoin-dev] [Meta] bitcoin-dev moderation

2019-08-01 Thread Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev
In the last #bitcoin-core-dev IRC meeting, the mailing list moderation was slightly discussed. It was decided to do this discussion mainly on this mailing list (which makes sense). The current situation is that the moderation is slow and takes around >24h for a E-Mail to be on the mailing list.

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed Extensions to BIP 174 for Future Extensibility

2019-08-01 Thread Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev
I spoke to some people OOB and they said that they didn't really like the idea of having a prefix string (partially because they've already implemented some proprietary types by simply squatting on unused types). Matching the prefix string adds additional complexity to the parser code. The main

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed Extensions to BIP 174 for Future Extensibility

2019-08-01 Thread Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev
It seems like the consensus is that we should use Compact Size Unsigned Integers for the field types, so we will do that. The types will be minimally encoded CSUints. For the proprietary types, I will use Dimitry's and Andrew Poelstra's

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed Extensions to BIP 174 for Future Extensibility

2019-08-01 Thread Stepan Snigirev via bitcoin-dev
> why not use Bitcoin compact uint, which most PSBT consumers already implement? I totally agree with that, compact int parsing is already implemented in all bitcoin applications, wallets and libraries. Also, for certain (mb proprietary) applications I will be willing to use multi-byte keys where

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Add a moving checkpoint to the Bitcoin protocol

2019-08-01 Thread Kenshiro [] via bitcoin-dev
mm you are right, then the "moving checkpoint" rule needs to have some limits to allow the network self-heal instead of requiring humans detecting the splits or stopping nodes. Let's suppose than a 51% attack can be detected and the developers can release a new version of the software with a