Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ring VS Schnorr signatures

2019-11-02 Thread Casciano, Anthony via bitcoin-dev
In the world of architectural trade-offs, specifically: confidentiality versus base layer performance, and in the current regulatory environment, as global monetary affairs begin to get "more real," I'm now leaning towards greater confidentiality rather than my earlier preference for

Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] CPFP Carve-Out for Fee-Prediction Issues in Contracting Applications (eg Lightning)

2019-11-02 Thread Johan TorĂ¥s Halseth via bitcoin-dev
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 6:16 PM David A. Harding wrote: > A parent transaction near the limit of 100,000 vbytes could have almost > 10,000 outputs paying OP_TRUE (10 vbytes per output). If the children > were limited to 10,000 vbytes each (the current max carve-out size), > that allows relaying