Re: [bitcoin-dev] Base64-encoded descriptors

2019-12-25 Thread Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev
Hi All, Just a few comments about choosing an encoding and why this is even being proposed. On Wednesday, December 25, 2019 12:17 PM, William Casarin via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I don't think encoding descriptors is a good idea. Encoding makes more > sense if it's non-human-readable binary data

[bitcoin-dev] Blind Merged Mining with covenants ( sighash_anyprevout / op_ctv )

2019-12-25 Thread Ruben Somsen via bitcoin-dev
Blind Merged Mining (BMM) is the idea of committing the hash of another blockchain into a unique location on the Bitcoin blockchain, and paying a Bitcoin fee to miners for the privilege of deciding this hash and capturing the fees inside the other blockchain. Since miners don’t have to know what

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Base64-encoded descriptors

2019-12-25 Thread William Casarin via bitcoin-dev
Hey Chris, Chris Belcher via bitcoin-dev writes: > I've recently been playing around with descriptors, and they are very > nice to work with. They should become the standard for master public > keys IMO. > > One downside is that users cant easily copypaste them to-and-fro to make > watch-only

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Base64-encoded descriptors

2019-12-25 Thread Trey Del Bonis via bitcoin-dev
Part of the aversion to using bech32 may be that the BCH code used in bech32 for error detection doesn't hold up for messages longer than some length (that I can't remember off the top of my head). It still encodes and decodes perfectly well but a decoder won't be guaranteed to detect potential