Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Replacement for RBF and CPFP: Non-Destructive TXID Dependencies for Fee Sponsoring

2020-09-18 Thread Cory Fields via bitcoin-dev
Conceptually this is so simple and explicit it almost seems like an obvious primitive. Glossing over some of the design/policy decisions... I wonder what the real-world privacy implications are due to the dependencies now being encoded on-chain rather than requiring some effort to watch the

[bitcoin-dev] A Replacement for RBF and CPFP: Non-Destructive TXID Dependencies for Fee Sponsoring

2020-09-18 Thread Jeremy via bitcoin-dev
Hi Bitcoin Devs, I'd like to share with you a draft proposal for a mechanism to replace CPFP and RBF for increasing fees on transactions in the mempool that should be more robust against attacks. A reference implementation demonstrating these rules is available