Good morning Tom,
> Hi ZmnSCPxj,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> > Okay, I suppose this is much too high-level a view, and I have no idea what
> > you mean by "statecoin" exactly.
>
> Sorry, most of the protocol details are in the links, but terminology should
> be made clearer. A "statecoin" is
Hi ZmnSCPxj,
Thanks for the reply.
> Okay, I suppose this is much too high-level a view, and I have no idea
what you mean by "statecoin" exactly.
Sorry, most of the protocol details are in the links, but terminology
should be made clearer. A "statecoin" is a UTXO that is a 2-of-2 between
the own
Right, I was off the shot. Thanks for the explanation.
As you mentioned, if the goal of the sponsor mechanism is to let any party
drive a state N's first tx to completion, you still have the issue of
concurrent states being pinned and thus non-observable for sponsoring by an
honest party.
E.g, Bo
Hi Jay,
I don't think there's much of a difference in security or privacy.
The advice to avoid key-reuse remains the same and for the same reasons.
LL
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 11:08 PM Jay Berg via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
>
> Newb here.. don’t know if "in-reply-to" header is misbehaving.
>
> But th
