[bitcoin-dev] Response to Rusty Russell from Github

2021-03-25 Thread Jeremy via bitcoin-dev
In response to https://gist.github.com/michaelfolkson/92899f27f1ab30aa2ebee82314f8fe7f#gistcomment-3679489, reproduced below. Rusty, I concur with the gist of what you're saying -- Speedy Trial alone is not the final word on activation logic. There are likely better procedures for releasing and a

Re: [bitcoin-dev] March 23rd 2021 Taproot Activation Meeting Notes

2021-03-25 Thread Jeremy via bitcoin-dev
I think it's fine to move the dates back two weeks in that case; it was unclear from the meeting transcript if people thought release would be may 1st or startheight, but via parameter flexibility we can shift everything back 2 weeks if we want. W.r.t. the selection of MTP there's no funny busines

Re: [bitcoin-dev] March 23rd 2021 Taproot Activation Meeting Notes

2021-03-25 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 08:46:54PM -0700, Jeremy via bitcoin-dev wrote: > 3. Parameter Selection > - There is broad agreement that we should target something like a May 1st > release, with 1 week from rc1 starttime/startheight, > and 3 months + delta stoptime/stopheight (6 retargetting periods)