Hi all,
A lot is being discussed but just wanted to react on some points.
# CSFS
Lloyd, good point about CSFS not providing the same privacy benefits, and
OP_CAT being required in addition. And thanks Philipp for the link to your
post, it was an interesting read!
Jeremy
>CSFS might have indepen
> On Feb 6, 2022, at 10:52, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>
>
>> Dear Bitcoin Developers,
>
>> -When I contacted bitInfoCharts to divide the first interval of addresses,
>> they kindly did divided to 3 intervals. From here:
>> https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addr
> Dear Bitcoin Developers,
> -When I contacted bitInfoCharts to divide the first interval of addresses,
> they kindly did divided to 3 intervals. From here:
> https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html
> -You can see that there are more than 3.1m addresses holding ≤ 0.0
I'm not sure what is meant concretely by (5) but I think overall
performance is ok here. You will always have 10mins or so to confirm the
DLC so you can't be too fussy about performance!
I mean that if you think of the CIT points as being the X axis (or
independent axes if multivariate) of a cont
Dear Bitcoin Developers,
-I think you may remember me sending to you about my proposal to partition
( and other stuff all about) the UTXO set Merkle in bridge servers
providing proofs Stateless nodes.
-While those previous suggestions might not have been on the most interest
of core Developers, I
Hi Jeremy,
On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 04:21, Jeremy wrote:
> Lloyd,
>
> This is an excellent write up, the idea and benefits are clear.
>
> Is it correct that in the case of a 3/5th threshold it is a total 10x *
> 30x = 300x improvement? Quite impressive.
>
Yes I think so but I am mostly guessing
