Re: [bitcoin-dev] Package Relay Proposal

2022-05-25 Thread Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev
> From: bitcoin-dev On Behalf > Of Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2022 11:56 AM > So the other thing is what happens if the peer announcing packages to us is > dishonest? > > They announce pkg X, say X has parents A B C and the fee rate is garbage. But > actually X has

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Package Relay Proposal

2022-05-25 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On 24 May 2022 5:05:35 pm GMT-04:00, Gloria Zhao via bitcoin-dev wrote: >To clarify, in this situation, I'm imagining something like >A: 0 sat, 100vB >B: 1500 sat, 100vB >C: 0 sat, 100vB >X: 500 sat, 100vB >feerate floor is 3sat/vB > >With the algo: >> * is X alone above my fee rate? no, then

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Silent Payments – Non-interactive private payments with no on-chain overhead

2022-05-25 Thread Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
i like the 00 || X_spend || X_scan + mandate address reuse prevention. might as well start with something strict easy to loosen it later - if needed - harder to tighten it later because of back-compatibility with addresses in-use On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:02 AM alicexbt via bitcoin-dev <