Re: [bitcoin-dev] Third version of Silent Payment implementation

2022-10-03 Thread Ruben Somsen via bitcoin-dev
Hi, Apologies, the link I sent in my previous post was incorrect and should have been: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24897#issuecomment-1218641521 Let me also use this opportunity to share another clarifying comment: "There seems to be some confusion about the function of the identifie

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Trustless Address Server – Outsourcing handing out addresses to prevent address reuse

2022-10-03 Thread Ruben Somsen via bitcoin-dev
Hi David, Thanks for the excellent suggestion, that makes the protocol much more elegant and actually increases my optimism about its practicality. Also, interesting observation that there is overlap with BIP78. From the perspective of the recipient it does mean there's a potential privacy reducti

Re: [bitcoin-dev] bitcoin-inquistion: evaluating soft forks on signet

2022-10-03 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 03:25:19PM +, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I'm also perfectly happy with the status quo of the default signet > having block signers and gatekeepers for soft forks activated on the > default signet. I'm more concerned with those gatekeepers being under > pres

Re: [bitcoin-dev] MuSig2 BIP

2022-10-03 Thread Jonas Nick via bitcoin-dev
Since the initial publication of the BIP draft, we incorporated feedback from this mailing list and the development git repository and made significant improvements compared to the initial version. There are multiple implementations today, and there have been no requests for major changes or featu