Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission

2023-01-01 Thread Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
Is a storage fee averaged out over many future blocks - but not hardcoded value and regulated by a free market? The problem with demurrage I see is that the fee is taken when you spend. There is no additional income for miners if people are still hoarding. In tail emission even if people are

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission

2023-01-01 Thread Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
Yes, the idea is: if mining activity is growing - let's execute consecutive halvings but if miner exodus has happened - let's delay next halving until mining activity is recovered to previous levels If it gets to the point where a sudden drop in mining difficulty happens - delaying the next

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission

2023-01-01 Thread Alfie John via bitcoin-dev
On 31 Dec 2022, at 10:28 am, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote: > >> This way: >> >> 1. system cannot be played >> 2. only in case of destructive halving: system waits for the recovery of >> network security > > The immediate danger we have with halvings is that in a competitive market, >