On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 11:47:09PM +, Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> It seems like this proposal will encourage address reuse for vaults,
(That is listed as an explicit goal: "A single vault scriptPubKey should
be able to "receive" multiple deposits")
> However the current construction
Reminder: this is happening this _upcoming_ Tuesday.
Looking forward to the third session to roam over all the contracting
protocol use-cases and then listen to everyone doing research in the
contracting primitives/covenant spaces, where they would like more brain
power!
Best,
Antoine
Le ven. 6
Hi James,
This seems like a promising proposal, but I noticed have a few issues
regarding batching and privacy.
It seems like this proposal will encourage address reuse for vaults, at
least in some parts. It seems like it would not be difficult to ensure
that each vault address was unique through
Some further clarity on our unique trx hashes queried to our platform, our
initial and followup numbers on unique trx hashes queried were not accurate
- apologies. Bitcoin addresses queried and Usd value and unique were
accurate. This is as a result of our platform viewing each queried bitcoin
addr
Hi alicexbt
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll take a look at the branch.
I'm personally pretty bullish on Lightning and Core Lightning is criminally
underused. Plus it is more exciting (and hopefully will attract more
contributors) to try something ambitious than just trim Core. I'll see if it is
