Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs

2023-02-11 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 09:40:38AM -0500, Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Yes. If you would otherwise sign the tapleaf, then I would recommend also > signing the entire tapbranch. Opened https://github.com/bitcoin-inquisition/bitcoin/issues/19 for this. (I think it's better to call it

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs

2023-02-11 Thread Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
Yes. If you would otherwise sign the tapleaf, then I would recommend also signing the entire tapbranch. On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 12:15 AM Anthony Towns wrote: > On 9 February 2023 12:04:16 am AEST, Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev < > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >The fix fo