Re: [bitcoin-dev] On the experiment of the Bitcoin Contracting Primitives WG and marking this community process "up for grabs"

2023-07-20 Thread Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
Hi Greg, I'm very meeting your development approach with regards to starting smalls about consensus change primitives, and I think taproot has demonstrated some good historical process, which has good archives about how development was conducted (e.g the community-wide taproot review of which the

Re: [bitcoin-dev] On the experiment of the Bitcoin Contracting Primitives WG and marking this community process "up for grabs"

2023-07-20 Thread Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
Hi Keagan, On the claim that advanced contracting capabilities can improve the Lightning Network, yes this is a claim I can back and why with Gleb we published ideas about payment pools back in 2020, pointing out clearly the limitations of 2-party payment channels in terms of privacy and

Re: [bitcoin-dev] On the experiment of the Bitcoin Contracting Primitives WG and marking this community process "up for grabs"

2023-07-20 Thread Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
Hi antoine, Simplicity was just a stand in for "functionally complete" handwave. Cheers, Greg On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, 1:46 AM Antoine Riard wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I'm very meeting your development approach with regards to starting smalls > about consensus change primitives, and I think taproot