Re: [bitcoin-dev] Future of the bitcoin-dev mailing list

2023-11-13 Thread alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
Hi Overthefalls, +1 Using google for bitcoin mailing list is not good. It feels embarrassing that some developers that built and maintained the only decentralized network used to settle uncensored payments and some of them even working on nostr, can't build their own mailing list which is bett

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Future of the bitcoin-dev mailing list

2023-11-13 Thread Overthefalls via bitcoin-dev
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 09:37 -0600, Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev wrote: Google Groups is another interesting option, I don't think I'm the only person on this list that is strongly opposed to using google for anything. They are too big and they have their hand in everything, and their eyes (and an

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Future of the bitcoin-dev mailing list

2023-11-13 Thread Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
Thanks for the write up and thanks to the bitcoin-dev mailing list moderation team for their work along the years. If we can pick up a communication platform where platform moderators / infra maintainers have low-risk of being targeted by subpoena + gag order or "injonction administrative" (the eq

Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_Expire and Coinbase-Like Behavior: Making HTLCs Safer by Letting Transactions Expire Safely

2023-11-13 Thread Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
Your two latest mails. > The problem that OP_Expire aims to solve is the fact that Carol could prevent > Bob from learning about the preimage in time, while still getting a chance to > use the preimage herself. OP_Expire thoroughly solves that problem by ensuring > that the preimage is either broa