Onchain capacity is a red herring. There are so many problems with it and
we don't need to go into it here if it's already been beaten to death.
What we need are the op codes necessary to create a trustless,
disconnected graph of layer two solution.
We all know that some form of covenant
Erik/all,
Are you saying that node capacity is the primary technical limiting
factor to increasing adoption of bitcoin payments?
UBER & Lyft payments are actually poor examples because they are not
regular/monthly and I should not have used them (unless refilling
existing accounts, like gift
> Your knowledge is incorrect. As far as I know in the getting on for 2 years
> since the first CTV activation talk/attempt literally no one has built out a
> CTV use case and demonstrated it on signet with the possible exception of
> James O'Beirne's OP_VAULT which requires other new opcodes
> On Jan 2, 2024, at 10:50 AM, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>
> Your knowledge is incorrect. As far as I know in the getting on for 2 years
> since the first CTV activation talk/attempt literally no one has built out a
> CTV use case and demonstrated it on signet with the
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 01:54:04PM +, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > > But "target fixation" [0] is a thing too: maybe "CTV" (and/or "APO") were
> > > just a bad approach from the start.
> It is hard to discuss APO in a vacuum when this is going on the background
> but I'm
