On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 12:30 AM Nagaev Boris wrote:
>
> Node operators are likely to put UTXO set to SSD and blocks to HDD.
> SSD is more expensive than HDD.
Again, the UTXO set size argument is irrelevant. A simple transaction
is at disadvantage even if it doesn't result in a change of UTXO
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 10:43 PM wrote:
>
> I think it should be fixed. Because now, sending coins into P2WPKH is cheaper
> than sending them to P2TR, even though finally, when those coins are spent,
> the blockspace usage is cheaper for Taproot (when you spend by key) than for
> Segwit,
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 11:39 PM Keagan McClelland
wrote:
>
> > As a result, there are incentives structure distorted and critical
> inefficiencies/vulnerabilities (e.g. misallocation of block space,
> blockspace value destruction, disincentivized simple transaction,
> centralization around
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 8:06 PM Nagaev Boris wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 2:26 PM Greg Tonoski via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > As a result, there are incentives structure distorted and critical
> > inefficiencies/vulnerabilities (e.g. misallocation of block space,
Unfortunately, as near as I can tell there is no sensible way to
prevent people from storing arbitrary data in witnesses ...
To prevent "from storing arbitrary data in witnesses" is the extreme
case of the size limit discussed in this thread. Let's consider it along
with other (less radical)
Blockspace price for data of a simple transaction is higher than the
one for data of other ("complex") transactions: 3 vs 1.49
"weight"/byte in the examples below:
- 3=616 "weight" / 205 bytes (txid:
aabbcce67f2aa71932f789cac5468d39e3d2224d8bebb7ca2c3bf8c41d567cdd)
- 1.49=1140 "weight" / 767 bytes
