Re: [bitcoin-dev] We need to fix the block withholding attack

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Emin Gün Sirer < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev < > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> Do you specifically mean selfish mining as defined in Emin Gün >> Sirer/Ittay

Re: [bitcoin-dev] We need to fix the block withholding attack

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Peter Todd wrote: > On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 12:12:13AM -0800, Multipool Admin wrote: > > Any attempt to 'fix' this problem, would most likely require changes to > all > > mining software, why not just make mining more decentralized in

Re: [bitcoin-dev] We need to fix the block withholding attack

Any attempt to 'fix' this problem, would most likely require changes to all mining software, why not just make mining more decentralized in general? For example, allow anyone to submit proofs of work to Bitcoind that are some fraction of the network difficulty and receive payment for them if

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Memory leaks?

My nodes are continuously running getblocktemplate and getinfo, and I also suspected the issue is in either gbt or the rpc server. The instance only takes a few hours to get up to that memory usage. On Oct 18, 2015 8:59 AM, "Jonathan Toomim via bitcoin-dev" <

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Memory leaks?

I should also mention that this is definitely not an attack coming from connected nodes. My node experiencing the issue is only connected to 3 other nodes, all of which I control (via connect=). --Adam On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Multipool Admin wrote: > My nodes are