Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capacity increases for the Bitcoin system.

2015-12-08 Thread Ryan Butler via bitcoin-dev
I see, thanks for clearing that up, I misread what Gavin stated. On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:29 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Ryan Butler wrote: > >>I agree, but nothing I have advocated creates significant technical > >>debt.

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fees and the block-finding process

2015-08-07 Thread Ryan Butler via bitcoin-dev
Interesting position there Peter...you fear more people actually using bitcoin. The less on chain transactions the lower the velocity and the lower the value of the network. I would be careful what you ask for because you end up having nothing left to even root the security of these off chain

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fees and the block-finding process

2015-08-07 Thread Ryan Butler via bitcoin-dev
at 10:47 AM, Ryan Butler via bitcoin-dev bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote: Interesting position there Peter...you fear more people actually using bitcoin. The less on chain transactions the lower the velocity and the lower the value of the network. I would be careful what you ask

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Răspuns: Personal opinion on the fee market from a worried local trader

2015-07-29 Thread Ryan Butler via bitcoin-dev
: On 29 July 2015 at 20:41, Ryan Butler via bitcoin-dev bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote: Does an unlimited blocksize imply the lack of a fee market? Isn't every miner able to set their minimum accepted fee or transaction acceptance algorithm? The assumption is that wont work because

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Răspuns: Personal opinion on the fee market from a worried local trader

2015-07-29 Thread Ryan Butler via bitcoin-dev
Does an unlimited blocksize imply the lack of a fee market? Isn't every miner able to set their minimum accepted fee or transaction acceptance algorithm? On Jul 29, 2015 5:54 PM, s7r via bitcoin-dev bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote: We could care less about you selling your bitcoins