I see, thanks for clearing that up, I misread what Gavin stated.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:29 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Ryan Butler wrote:
> >>I agree, but nothing I have advocated creates significant technical
> >>debt.
Interesting position there Peter...you fear more people actually using
bitcoin. The less on chain transactions the lower the velocity and the
lower the value of the network. I would be careful what you ask for
because you end up having nothing left to even root the security of these
off chain
at 10:47 AM, Ryan Butler via bitcoin-dev
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
Interesting position there Peter...you fear more people actually using
bitcoin. The less on chain transactions the lower the velocity and the
lower the value of the network. I would be careful what you ask
:
On 29 July 2015 at 20:41, Ryan Butler via bitcoin-dev
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
Does an unlimited blocksize imply the lack of a fee market? Isn't every
miner able to set their minimum accepted fee or transaction acceptance
algorithm?
The assumption is that wont work because
Does an unlimited blocksize imply the lack of a fee market? Isn't every
miner able to set their minimum accepted fee or transaction acceptance
algorithm?
On Jul 29, 2015 5:54 PM, s7r via bitcoin-dev
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
We could care less about you selling your bitcoins