Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP CPRKV: Check private key verify

On Behalf Of Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev Sent: Monday, 29 February, 2016 19:53 Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP CPRKV: Check private key verify On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Mats Jerratsch <mat...@gmail.com <ma

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP CPRKV: Check private key verify

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Mats Jerratsch wrote: > This is actually very useful for LN too, see relevant discussion here > > > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-November/011827.html > Is there much demand for trying to code up a patch to the

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP CPRKV: Check private key verify

This is actually very useful for LN too, see relevant discussion here http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-November/011827.html 2016-02-12 11:05 GMT+01:00 Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev : > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:02 AM,

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP CPRKV: Check private key verify

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:02 AM, wrote: > Seems it could be done without any new opcode: > The assumption was that the altcoin would only accept standard output scripts. Alice's payment in step 2 pays to a non-standard script. This is an improvement over the cut and choose, but

[bitcoin-dev] BIP CPRKV: Check private key verify

There was some discussion on the bitcointalk forums about using CLTV for cross chain transfers. Many altcoins don't support CLTV, so transfers to those coins cannot be made secure. I created a protocol. It uses on cut and choose to allow commitments to publish private keys, but it is clunky and

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP CPRKV: Check private key verify

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Thomas Kerin wrote: > I wonder if this is possible as a soft fork without using segwit? Increasing the sigop count for a NOP would be a hard fork, but such a change would be fine with a new segwit version. It might require specific

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP CPRKV: Check private key verify

I wonder if this is possible as a soft fork without using segwit? Increasing the sigop count for a NOP would be a hard fork, but such a change would be fine with a new segwit version. It might require specific support in the altcoin, which might be troublesome.. On 11 Feb 2016 20:05, "Tier Nolan

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP CPRKV: Check private key verify

als secret B From: bitcoin-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfoundation.org [mailto:bitcoin-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev Sent: Friday, 12 February, 2016 04:05 To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP CPRKV: