Thanks for adding this to the record.
And for the record I’ll reiterate here, as I did with BIP90, that this is a
hard fork.
e
> On Aug 16, 2019, at 12:06, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:23:37AM -0400, John Newbery via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> Once a consens
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:23:37AM -0400, John Newbery via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Once a consensus change has been activated and buried by sufficient work,
> we consider the height of that change to be historic fact. The exact
> activation method is no longer of practical interest. In some cases the
Once a consensus change has been activated and buried by sufficient work,
we consider the height of that change to be historic fact. The exact
activation method is no longer of practical interest. In some cases the
cause of activation is not even decidable. For example, we know that segwit
activate
