On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Yifu Guo via bitcoin-dev
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
I like the intend of this attempt to bring more clarity to the blocksize
debate, however it would be more help to make this a information site about
the current outstanding BIPs and summarize
I like the intend of this attempt to bring more clarity to the blocksize
debate, however it would be more help to make this a information site about
the current outstanding BIPs and summarize their differences rather than
voting mechanism.
(ofcourse the author of the BIPs would vote for their own
Yifu Guo via bitcoin-dev:
One thing is for sure though, not increasing the blocksize is not an option.
Why not? The blocksize increase eliminates the pressure to seek durable
solutions. But it will turn out differently. Other than we all think.
I really can not imagine that a 20-year plan will
Keeping the block size at 1mb restricts the number of active users of bitcoin
to around 100,000 people transacting twice a day on blockchain.
BItcoin is a protocol. Protocols are successful because of their network
effect. Capping the block size freezes bitcoin’s network effect, limits
accordingly to public release[1], They.
1. agreed that blocksize increase is needed.
2. opposed original 20mb, suggest 8mb instead as it is more technically
reasonable.
3. do not want blocksize to change in the short term future ( direct
translation. ) and in the document states.
after discussion
My UX skills are lacking a bit. You can edit all your thoughts about each
BIP, HTML is accepted, so you can link to other posts you made somewhere
else.
When you click on a cell in the grid, it forward you to the page that the
dev edited for this BIP.
This website is not only to say approve,
Am 21.08.2015 um 15:34 schrieb Will Madden:
Keeping the block size at 1mb restricts the number of active users of bitcoin
to around 100,000 people transacting twice a day on blockchain.
BItcoin is a protocol. Protocols are successful because of their network
effect. Capping the block
I’m replying all just because my point was changed in your response.
As a protocol Bitcoin could support millions of full nodes. What you
talking about is the number of shareholders. But these are poorly
determined by the block size. The number of shareholders is determined
by many parameter
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
Decision making is not the goal of this site, it is only a way to see
various pros and cons of various devs on various proposals in a single
place.
This is for the community to have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 20 August 2015 21:45:23 GMT-07:00, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
I think this is a bit well, sad, at the moment-- a basic principle in
sound decision making is that one should try to withhold
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
What might be valuable is to ask devs to explain what their threat models
are, what should be at the root of their thinking about the blocksize.
That's exactly what the Technical Opinion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 21 August 2015 02:31:51 GMT-07:00, Btc Drak btcd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
What might be valuable is to ask devs to explain what their threat
I was looking at this site recently and it's not very clear that by
clicking the name you get their opinion. I would make that a separate
column stated, Technical Opinion.
I think you need to include more of the developers/technical people,
Adam Back, Mark Friedenback, Jorge Timons, (all of who
Thanks, btcdrak, I just added the column and you in the list. (looks nicer)
What I am calling core devs in the website is only commit access
people, should I rename this group ?
I just want a way to improve readability of the website by grouping, I am
open to all subjection on different way of
I created a small website which show a chart of your approvals about
various BIPs (which you must fill by yourself with a signed pgp message)
For each BIP, you can fill if you approve or not, and give comments. (HTML
accepted, so you can link stuff you your posts)
It would help the community a
15 matches
Mail list logo
