> IIRC, here I think we also need _package relay_ in strict addition of
_package RBF_,
Yes, sorry if that wasn't clear. Package Relay -> Package RBF -> V3 ->
Ephemeral Anchors
> If we allow non-zero value in ephemeral outputs, I think we're slightly
modifying the incentives games of the channels
Hi Greg,
Thanks for proposing forward the "ephemeral anchors" policy change.
> In Gloria's proposal for ln-penalty, this is worked
> around by reducing the number of anchors per commitment transaction to 1,
> and each version of the commitment transaction has a unique party's key on
> it. The
Hello Everyone,
Following up on the "V3 Transaction" discussion here
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-September/020937.html
, I would like to elaborate a bit further on some potential follow-on work
that would make pinning severely constrained in many setups].
V3
