Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removing Single Point of Failure with Seed Phrase Storage

2020-03-06 Thread Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 2:56 PM Jeremy via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > As a replacement for paper, something like this makes sense v.s. what you > do with a ledger presently. > > However, shamir's shares notoriously have the issue that the key does > exist

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removing Single Point of Failure with Seed Phrase Storage

2020-02-28 Thread ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
Good morning Christopher, > > > As a replacement for paper, something like this makes sense v.s. what you > > do with a ledger presently. > > > > However, shamir's shares notoriously have the issue that the key does exist > > plaintext on a device at some point. > > > > Non-interactive multisig

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removing Single Point of Failure with Seed Phrase Storage

2020-02-26 Thread Jeremy via bitcoin-dev
As a replacement for paper, something like this makes sense v.s. what you do with a ledger presently. However, shamir's shares notoriously have the issue that the key does exist plaintext on a device at some point. Non-interactive multisig has the benefit of being able to sign transactions

[bitcoin-dev] Removing Single Point of Failure with Seed Phrase Storage

2020-02-26 Thread Contact Team via bitcoin-dev
Hi Everyone, Seed phrase security has been a subject of discussion for a long time now. Though there are varying opinions on the subject but the conflict usually arises due to different security models used by different individuals. The general practice in the space has been to use paper or metal