Hi Peter,
Thank you for your comments. My replies are below:
> The section describing this timestamping service simply isn't detailed enough
> to understand what the timestamping service is exactly. Also, I strongly
> suspect you are misusing the term "timestamping" to refer to something
>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 05:21:39PM +, Dr Maxim Orlovsky via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> Some time ago we (LNP/BP Standards Association) announced the release of RGB
> smart contract system [1]. In the subsequent discussion, we have referenced
> [2] that the introduction of
Hi John,
Thank you for the question. We have discussed this case in the paper, second
paragraph of the “Bitcoin PoW Anchoring” Section:
> If a party spends current miner single-use-seal without creating a commitment
> - or committing to a header without sufficient PoW, such closing is
>
> The white paper describing the proposal can be found here:
> https://github.com/LNP-BP/layer1/
Some questions about the Bitcoin PoW anchoring:
What if a miner spends the current miner single-use-seal while
creating a commitment, but makes the PMT only partially available, or
entirely
Dear community,
Some time ago we (LNP/BP Standards Association) announced the release of RGB
smart contract system [1]. In the subsequent discussion, we have referenced [2]
that the introduction of client-side validation has the potential for upgrading
Bitcoin layer 1 - blockchain, which has
