Indeed a large testnet blockchain has advantages too.
But because it is the testnet and the testnet coins have no value, the
blockchain could be 'spammed' after a reset for some days/weeks until it
has a certain size.
Could this be realistic solution ?
Am 16.06.19 um 22:25 schrieb Peter Todd:
>
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 05:01:50PM +0200, Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I don't get why the testnet shouldn't be resetted just because there is a
> (probably better) alternative for it. The testnet is still a thing and is
> also used.
Remember that the size of testnet itself is an
I don't get why the testnet shouldn't be resetted just because there is
a (probably better) alternative for it. The testnet is still a thing and
is also used.
Am 08.06.19 um 16:21 schrieb Bryan Bishop:
Be greeted Emil,
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 9:21 AM Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev
Be greeted Emil,
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 9:21 AM Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hello, I tried myself with some Bitcoin development. For this I used of
> course the Bitcoin testnet. However it took me one hour to sync the
> blockchain with around
Hello, I tried myself with some Bitcoin development. For this I used of
course the Bitcoin testnet. However it took me one hour to sync the
blockchain with around 1538358 blocks. In my opinion that is too much
for a testnet. Especially the blockchain size with around 26GB is so
much. Would it
