Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 174 thoughts

2018-06-22 Thread Achow101 via bitcoin-dev
Hi all, After reading the comments here about BIP 174, I would like to propose the following changes: - Moving redeemScripts, witnessScripts, and BIP 32 derivation paths to per-input and per-output data I think that by moving these three fields into input and output specific maps, the format

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 174 thoughts

2018-06-22 Thread Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Peter D. Gray via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I have personally implemented this spec on an embedded micro, as > the signer and finalizer roles, and written multiple parsers for > it as well. There is nothing wrong with it, and it perfectly meets > my needs as a