Thanks for the update Johnson, just wanted to give a really quick NACK
on the SIGHASH_NOINPUT variant: the whole idea of BIP 118 is to have
floating transactions that can be bound to predecessors, and still
enforce some application logic. In eltoo's case this is the fact that
the state number
After gathering some feedbacks I substantially revised the proposal. This
version focus on improving security, and reduces the number of optional
features.
Formatted BIP and sample code at:
https://github.com/jl2012/bips/blob/sighash2/bip-sighash2.mediawiki
A public testnet is still useful so in articles people could make references to
these transactions.
Maybe we could have 2 testnets at the same time, with one having a smaller
block size?
> On 31 Aug 2018, at 4:02 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> On Thu, Aug 30,
Stupid question time:
Why don't we have multiple testnets?
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:31 PM Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 12:58:42PM +0530, shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Testnet is now 1411795
This seems like a case where a distinction should be made between soft
forks which are likely to cause non-upgraded miners to get orphaned and
ones where they are. Of course in this case it's only 1/2016 of all blocks
so it doesn't really matter, but it's worth thinking about the principle.
In
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 12:58:42PM +0530, shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Testnet is now 1411795 blocks and a full sync is taking atleast 48 hours.
>
> Is a testnet reset scheduled in the next release or any reason not to do a
> reset ?
>
> Fast onboarding/lower disk overheads
I've just finished writing an implementing of this, and extremely happy with
how it turned out. So I'd like to go and try go down the path of more formally
describing it and getting some comments and ultimately encourage its
wide-spread use.
==Abstract==
The way bitcoin transactions are
Thanks, I'll check it out.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018, 3:33 PM Aymeric Vitte wrote:
>
>
> Le 28/08/2018 à 20:36, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev a écrit :
> > I’d like to hear some concrete use-cases for a such block explorer(ish)
> API.
>
> https://github.com/Ayms/bitcoin-transactions which is
Le 28/08/2018 à 20:36, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev a écrit :
> I’d like to hear some concrete use-cases for a such block explorer(ish) API.
https://github.com/Ayms/bitcoin-transactions which is somewhere
bitcoin-cli outside of bitcoin core with no wallet, which implies that
you don't want to
Hi,
Testnet is now 1411795 blocks and a full sync is taking atleast 48 hours.
Is a testnet reset scheduled in the next release or any reason not to do a
reset ?
Fast onboarding/lower disk overheads would be very much appreicated for
testing purposes
Regards
--
Shiva S
CEO @ Blockonomics
10 matches
Mail list logo
