Hi ZmnSCPxj,
Thank you for your counterproposal. I fully agree that as a first step we
must establish whether the proposed functionality can be implemented
without making any changes to consensus.
Your counterproposal is understandably more technical in nature because it
explores an
Good morning Zac,
> Thank you for your counterproposal. I fully agree that as a first step we
> must establish whether the proposed functionality can be implemented without
> making any changes to consensus.
>
> Your counterproposal is understandably more technical in nature because it
>
Good morning TS,
> Entering a BTC address for a transaction can pose a risk of error (human or
> technical). While
> there is a checksum integrated in BTC addresses already, this is used only at
> a technical
> level and does not avoid entering a valid but otherwise wrong address.
> Moreover,
Entering a BTC address for a transaction can pose a risk of error (human or technical). While
there is a checksum integrated in BTC addresses already, this is used only at a technical
level and does not avoid entering a valid but otherwise wrong address. Moreover, it does not
improve the
