On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
>
>
Have you seen how BLAKE2 omits padding when the data to be hashed happens
> to be
> exactly one block in size? It's significantly faster than SHA256, and
> that's a
> standard part of the algorithm already.
>
That's very convenient! I didn't
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 04:08:51PM +, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Daniel Cousens opened the issue a few weeks ago, that BIP 9 should progress
> to
> Accepted stage. However, as an informational BIP, it is not entirely clear on
> whether it falls in the Draft/Accepted/Final classific
Daniel Cousens opened the issue a few weeks ago, that BIP 9 should progress to
Accepted stage. However, as an informational BIP, it is not entirely clear on
whether it falls in the Draft/Accepted/Final classification of proposals
requiring implementation, or the Draft/Active classification like
