Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: derived mnemonics

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Jochen Hoenicke via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev > schrieb am Di., 26. Juli 2016 um 22:10 Uhr: >> >> Side-note: Bip39 does still use PBKDF2 with 2048 iterations

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reasons to add sync flags to Bitcoin

I made a repo to be a home for sync_flags here: https://github.com/moral-agent/sync_flags If you see any personally identifying information, please be a good sport and let me know. I'm a nobody, but I'd still prefer not to get doxxed. Two changes to the proposal (see repo for explanations) 1.

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: derived mnemonics

> But what are the alternatives? Put an expensive processor and a decent > amount of memory in every hardware wallet to support scrypt? Use a > million iterations and just wait 10 minutes after entering you > passphrase? Or compute the secret key on your online computer instead? What the

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: derived mnemonics

Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev schrieb am Di., 26. Juli 2016 um 22:10 Uhr: > Side-note: Bip39 does still use PBKDF2 with 2048 iterations which I > personally consider "not enough" to protect a serious amount of funds. > > But what are the alternatives? Put