Re: [bitcoin-dev] Planned Obsolescence

2016-12-15 Thread Ethan Heilman via bitcoin-dev
I assume this has been well discussed in at some point in the Bitcoin community, so I apologize if I'm repeating old ideas. Problem exploitable nodes: It is plausible that people running these versions of bitcoind may not be applying patches. Thus, these nodes may be vulnerable to known exploits.

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Planned Obsolescence

2016-12-15 Thread Angel Leon via bitcoin-dev
Perhaps if there were a message that would nag your stdout or log output letting you know there's a new version available, or N more versions available and that you might be missing out on X security patches, Y protocol improvements, depending on how far back you are, you'd be tempted to upgrade, w

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Planned Obsolescence

2016-12-15 Thread Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Juan Garavaglia via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Older node versions may generate issues because some upgrades will make > several of the nodes running older protocol versions obsolete and or > incompatible. There may be other hard to predict behaviors on older versions >

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Planned Obsolescence

2016-12-15 Thread Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
Maybe there are still some advantages but I don't know why this is not considered as a major issue by the bitcoin community for the future and why this looks to be never discussed: - the size of the bitcoin network in terms of full nodes is ridiculous and this is continuously decreasing, we cannot

[bitcoin-dev] Planned Obsolescence

2016-12-15 Thread Juan Garavaglia via bitcoin-dev
Today according to the stats at https://bitnodes.21.co/nodes/ the top 10 Bitcoin running node versions are: 1. _Version Satoshi:0.13.1 _Nodes 2071 _38.97% 2. _Version Satoshi:0.12.1 _Nodes 1022 _19.23% 3. Satoshi:0.13.0 _Nodes 604 _11.36% 4. Bitcoin Unlimited:0.12.1 _Nodes 373 _7.02% 5.