On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:39 AM, Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On 08/01/18 05:22, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> >> https://github.com/satoshilabs/slips/blob/master/slip-0039.md
>
>
> > The 16-bit "checksum" based on sha2 seems pretty poor since basing
>
Trezor's "plausible deniability" scheme could very well result in you going to
jail for lying to border security, because it's so easy for them to simply
brute force alternate passwords based on your seeds. With that, they have proof
that you lied to customs, a serious offense.
The passphrase
Hello guys,
After reviewing some bitcoin improvement proposals, I noticed that one of the
words that can be found on the BIP39 English wordlist is “satoshi”.
I suggest removing this word from the list so it’s less obvious that it’s a
bitcoin seed when found by a malicious third party.
On Jan 9, 2018 13:41, "Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
The use of the alt stack is a hack for segwit script version 0 which has
the clean stack rule. Anticipated future improvements here are to switch to
a witness script version, and a new segwit
The use of the alt stack is a hack for segwit script version 0 which has the
clean stack rule. Anticipated future improvements here are to switch to a
witness script version, and a new segwit output version which supports native
MAST to save an additional 40 or so witness bytes. Either approach
I've just re-read BIP 117, and I'm concerned about its flexibility. It
seems to be doing too much.
The use of altstack is awkward, and makes me query this entire approach.
I understand that CLEANSTACK painted us into a corner here :(
The simplest implementation of tail recursion would be a
