On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:39:46AM -0500, Russell O'Connor wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
> > > I mean, I think in general solving this problem is probably not
> possible.
> > > Basically, the fundamental problem
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:39:46AM -0500, Russell O'Connor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
> > I mean, I think in general solving this problem is probably not possible.
> > Basically, the fundamental problem is someone else has consumed network
> > bandwidth that should
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:25:59AM -0500, Russell O'Connor wrote:
> > When you say that you don't think it is possible to solve, do you mean
> that
> > there is a specific problem with this proposal of replacing transactions
> > when offered a
Hello,
Our reasoning for coming up with a new method for miner configuration
was stated here: https://github.com/slushpool/stratumprotocol/issues/1
It is primarily the determinism of expecting the response. That is
the reason why we chose a new method mining.configure instead of an
existing minin