Re: [bitcoin-dev] Should Graftroot be optional?

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:44:16AM +0200, Natanael via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > As stated above by Wuille this seems to not be a concern for typical P2SH > uses, but my argument here is simply that in many cases, not all > stakeholders in a transaction will hold one of the private keys required to

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Should Graftroot be optional?

Den tor 24 maj 2018 04:08Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> skrev: > > My understanding of the question is this: > > Are there any useful applications which would be impeded if a signing > party who could authorize an arbitrary transaction spending a coin had

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Should Graftroot be optional?

Den tor 24 maj 2018 01:45Gregory Maxwell skrev: > I am having a bit of difficulty understanding your example. > > If graftroot were possible it would mean that the funds were paid to a > public key. That holder(s) of the corresponding private key could > sign without constraint,