On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Jonas Schnelli wrote:
>> If there is interest, I can construct a code + implementation for any
>> of these in a few days probably, once the requirements are clear.
>
> Yes. Please.
Here is an example BCH code for base32 data which adds 27 checksum
characters, and c
> An example of that cost is you arguing against specifying and supporting
the
> design that is closer to one that would be softforked, which increases the
> time until we can make these filters secure because it
> slows convergence on the design of what would get committed
Agreed, since the commi
> Doesn't the current BIP157 protocol have each filter commit to the filter
> for the previous block?
Yep!
> If that's the case, shouldn't validating the commitment at the tip of the
> chain (or buried back whatever number of blocks that the SPV client
trusts)
> obliviate the need to validate the
