Correct, there is an interaction step to deduce G*k, when signing, each
participant has to publishes G*ki. I didn't talk about it. That doesn't
break it, but you're correct, it's not non-interactive.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:06 AM Andrew Poelstra
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 08:26:14AM
Why would you call it FUD? All the weird hemming and hawing about it is
really strange to me. The more I look into it and speak to professors
about i, the more it seems "so trivial nobody really talks about it".
1. Generate an M of N shared public key (done in advance of signing
this gets
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 9:43 PM Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> We looked at doing this previously in Bitcoin core and jtimon had some
> patches, but the existing approach increased the size of the
> blockindex objects in memory while not in signed testnet mode. This
> could probably
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 08:26:14AM -0400, Erik Aronesty wrote:
> Why would you call it FUD? All the weird hemming and hawing about it is
> really strange to me. The more I look into it and speak to professors
> about i, the more it seems "so trivial nobody really talks about it".
>
> 1.
