Re: [bitcoin-dev] Interrogating a BIP157 server, BIP158 change proposal

2019-02-07 Thread Tamas Blummer via bitcoin-dev
The attack was in your implication that I would assume ill intent of those contributed to the proposal. That is not my position. I explained why, I think, rolling out a commitment could face opposition. This foreseable opposition, that must not come from you makes me prefer a provable uncommitted

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Interrogating a BIP157 server, BIP158 change proposal

2019-02-07 Thread Tamas Blummer via bitcoin-dev
I do not think this ad hominem attack of you on me was justified. I wrote code, gathered and shared data now and back in 2018. I showed understanding of non technical issues. Is there an actual action that defies my observation that a commitment is not yet in sight? Is there anything technically

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Interrogating a BIP157 server, BIP158 change proposal

2019-02-07 Thread Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:10 AM Tamas Blummer wrote: > I am skeptical that commitment of any filter will come into Core soon. [...] > A committed filter makes light clients much more reliable and attractive, for > some taste too much more. You keep repeating this smear. Please stop. If you