Hi Aleksey,
Yes, BIP158 uses the block hash to seed the hash function, which makes distinct
block filters non-aggregatable
for common values. Aggregate fiters on ranges of blocks would have to use some
other seed and then
achive significant savings using the same design.
I think that the
> However, my understanding is that, at least with the original
> mimblewimble.txt from Jedusor, the signatures and the
> Pedersen-commitment-to-0 could all be aggregated into a single signature and
> Pedersen-commitment-to-0, if we were to use Schnorr-like signatures.
Non-interactive
