On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 03:24:46PM -0500, Russell O'Connor wrote:
Thanks for the careful write up! That matches what I was thinking.
> This analysis suggests that we should amend CODESEPARATORs behaviour to update
> an accumulator (presumably a running hash value), so that all executed
>
Good morning Jose,
> > It also means that to register an account, you need to either own some
> > Bitcoins, or rent some Bitcoins to serve as signalling (and then
> > potentially have to change your account identifier later when the lease
> > expires).
>
> I don’t understand what you mean by
After chatting with andytoshi and others, and some more thinking I've been
convinced that my specific concern about other users masquerading other
people pubkeys as their own in complex scripts is actually a non-issue.
No matter what you write in Script (today), you are limited to expressing
some
Hi ZmnSCPxj
first of all, excuse me for my delayed answer.
I think I posted to the wrong address the first time (I’m mainly a lurker in
the list, so I make gotchas like that…)
Let me address your points.
> It also means that to register an account, you need to either own some
> Bitcoins, or
> Hello José,
>
> Just a quick question, this is fully decentralized?
> Greetings,
>
> Tim Blokdijk
Tim,
it is fully decentralized indeed.
Every user is in charge of creating and maintaining his own account.
Regards,
José Femenías___
bitcoin-dev
