Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal for new "disabletx" p2p message

2021-01-13 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:35:11AM -0500, Suhas Daftuar via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I'm proposing the addition of a new, optional p2p message to allow peers to > communicate that they do not want to send or receive (loose) transactions for > the lifetime of a connection.  > > The goal of this

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal for new "disabletx" p2p message

2021-01-13 Thread Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
So we’d kill two birds with one stone if all bloom support was dropped. As far as I understand, precomputed filters are now provided via p2p connections as well. Matt > On Jan 14, 2021, at 00:33, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 01:40:03AM -0500, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal for new "disabletx" p2p message

2021-01-13 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 01:40:03AM -0500, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Out of curiosity, was the interaction between fRelay and bloom disabling ever > specified? ie if you aren’t allowed to enable bloom filters on a connection > due > to resource constraints/new limits, is it ever