I’m pretty sure it’s subtle mockery. Even a legit title doesn’t warrant
additional attention.
e
> On Mar 12, 2021, at 14:02, R E Broadley via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>
> Can I just point out (to those addressing James as Lord/Excelency/etc
> that he isn't noble nor a Lord, so just wanted to men
Hi, I awkwardly phrased that part, I was referring to key validation in
relation to that section as well as the hashing related to those keys. I
might rephrase it.
In regards to technical merit, the main purpose of the BIP is to get a
sense of the idea. Once I get assigned a BIP draft #, I am will
secp236k1 isn't a hashing algo. your BIP needs about 10 more pages
and some degree of technical merit.
i suggest you start here:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Proof_of_burn
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=225690.0
proof-of-burn is a nice alternative to proof-of-work. i always
suspected
Can I just point out (to those addressing James as Lord/Excelency/etc
that he isn't noble nor a Lord, so just wanted to mention this in case
people were giving him more attention than the average person would be
afforded.
My 2p (an equal 2p) on Taproot is ACK, by the way.
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 0
