Sounds really interesting, thanks. Making CPFP reliable would be very nice
in my opinion.
On Sat, May 29, 2021, 14:24 Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi Mark and Clara,
>
> Great research, thanks for it!
>
> Few questions out of mind after a first r
@befreeandopen "If you want to make some arbitrary very narrow
definitions of what nothing at stake is so that you can claim your false
statement that it is a solved problem"
Wow, you are really unnecessarily hostile. This isn't r/bitcoin my friend.
Please assume some good faith. I simply pointe
Hi Mark and Clara,
Great research, thanks for it!
Few questions out of mind after a first read.
> This approach enables block building to consider Child Pays For Parent
(CPFP) constellations.
I think that's a really interesting point, it's likely that such
transaction graphs with multiple disju
