Hey James,
In the examples you mentioned, what I was exploring was a mechanism of
attack by which the attacker could steal user A's key and use that key to
send a transaction with the maximum possible fee. User B would still
receive some funds (probably), but if the fee could be large, the
Hi Billy!
See above, but to break down that situation a bit further, these are the
> two situations I can think of:
>
>1. The opcode limits user/group A to send the output to user/group B
>2. The opcode limits user A to send from one address they own to
>another address they own.
>
>
> it's important to remember that every miner is also a user of Bitcoin
and ever user of Bitcoin may also someday be a miner
That's certainly true. One good quantification for how much of a problem
this could be is to calculate the cost of the attack vs the damage done in
the attack. So let me
