Re: [bitcoin-dev] Year 2038 problem and year 2106 chain halting

2021-10-15 Thread ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
Good morning yanmaani, > It's well-known. Nobody really cares, because it's so far off. Not > possible to do by softfork, no. I think it is possible by softfork if we try hard enough? > 1. The block timestamp may not be lower than the median of the last 11 > blocks' > > 2. The block time

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Year 2038 problem and year 2106 chain halting

2021-10-15 Thread vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
Your solution seems to solve the problem of chain halting, but there are more issues. For example: if you have some time modulo 2^32, then you no longer know if timestamp zero is related to 1970 or 2106 or some higher year. Your "k" value representing in fact the most significant 32 bits of 64-b

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Year 2038 problem and year 2106 chain halting

2021-10-15 Thread yanmaani--- via bitcoin-dev
It's well-known. Nobody really cares, because it's so far off. Not possible to do by softfork, no. It is possible to do by something that becomes a hardfork in 80 years, though, which is probably good enough. I proposed a solution, but nobody was really interested. Let's see if anyone bites no

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Year 2038 problem and year 2106 chain halting

2021-10-15 Thread James Lu via bitcoin-dev
Making Bitcoin function after 2038 is by definition a hard fork I feel if we do HF, we should bundle other HF changes with it... On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 5:19 PM vjudeu via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > It seems that Bitcoin Core will stop working in 2038 because o

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot testnet wallet

2021-10-15 Thread Prayank via bitcoin-dev
Hi Andreas, > I'm trying to finish off bitcoinj's implementation for sending to taproot addresses. For this, I'd like to test against a wallet that can receive to P2TR and spend back. I did this transaction few days back which creates a P2TR output while answering a question on Bitcoin Stackexc

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot testnet wallet

2021-10-15 Thread vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
On 2021-10-15 03:05:36 user Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Same stuff works with testnet, though I'm not sure if any testnet faucets will accept bech32m addresses directly. There are faucets that accept such addresses, for example https://bitcoinfaucet.uo1.net/, but you have to use bec

Re: [bitcoin-dev] On the regularity of soft forks

2021-10-15 Thread Felipe Micaroni Lalli via bitcoin-dev
Interesting discussion. Correct me if I'm wrong: but putting too many features together in one shot just can't make things harder to debug in production if something very unexpected happens. It's a basic principle of software engineering. Change. Deploy. Nothing bad happened? Change it a little mo