Re: [bitcoin-dev] Stumbling into a contentious soft fork activation attempt

2022-01-10 Thread Jeremy via bitcoin-dev
Please see the following bips PRs which are follow ups to the concrete actionables raised by Peter. Thanks for bringing these up, it certainly improves the reviewability of the BIP. https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1271 https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1272 -- @JeremyRubin

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Stumbling into a contentious soft fork activation attempt

2022-01-10 Thread Jeremy via bitcoin-dev
Hi Peter, Thank you for your review and feedback. Apologies for the difficulties in reviewing. The branch linked from the BIP is not the latest, the branch in the PR is what should be considered https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21702 for review and has more thorough well documented tests

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Stumbling into a contentious soft fork activation attempt

2022-01-10 Thread Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 02:05:20AM +, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev wrote: > There have been a number of “soft signals”, many expressing enthusiasm for > the speculated use cases of OP_CTV. Personally I share that enthusiasm like I > do with the prospect of curing cancer. But these soft