Re: [bitcoin-dev] CTV dramatically improves DLCs

2022-03-15 Thread Jeremy Rubin via bitcoin-dev
I've created a prototype of this protocol in Sapio for your perusal: https://github.com/sapio-lang/sapio/blob/master/sapio-contrib/src/contracts/derivatives/dlc.rs Feel free to tweak the test and use it as a benchmark, i tested 1 oracle with 100,000 different payouts and saw it take around 13s

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Speedy Trial

2022-03-15 Thread Jeremy Rubin via bitcoin-dev
Boker tov bitcoin devs, A mechanism of soft-forking against activation exists. What more do you > want? > Agreed -- that should be enough. > Are we supposed to write the code on behalf of this hypothetical group of > users who may or may not exist for them just so that they can have a node >

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Speedy Trial

2022-03-15 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 02:04:29PM +, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > Thirdly, if some users insist on a chain where taproot is > > "not activated", they can always softk-fork in their own rule that > > disallows the version bits that complete the Speedy Trial activation > > sequence,

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Improving RBF Policy

2022-03-15 Thread Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
Hi Gloria, It seems you're responding to what I wrote on github. Happy to respond, but perhaps we should keep it there so the conversation is kept linearly together? I'm curious what you think of my thoughts on what you brought up most recently in this thread about rate limiting / staggered