"Some people say CTV is contentious, but they're spreading misinformation"?
Really? Seriously?
Come on, guys, we can do better than nina jankovich and the "fact checkers".
Please, rise the bar.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022, 19:44 alicexbt via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
Hi John,
> Core development is not a hackathon project.
>
> None of the quoted following items are features or responsibilities of the
> Bitcoin software, nor Core developers
Core development was never listed as a hackathon project. Although I did not
share responsibilities, they will improve
Some people think that sidechains are good. But to put them into some working
solution, people think that some kind of soft-fork is needed. However, it seems
that it can be done in a no-fork way, here is how to make it permissionless,
and introduce them without any forks.
First, we should make
> will never be justifiable simply because you and some of your friends
think it is totally cool and might make more people like you or give your
friends funding.
100%
But while the OP may have given less than ideal reasons for things like
covenants, it does not broadly characterize the reasons
Core development is not a hackathon project.
None of the quoted following items are features or responsibilities of the
Bitcoin software, nor Core developers.
Quoted:
"- Developers can build interesting projects with real demand in market.
- Students learn Sapio and not just solidity.
- Better
Totally agree.
I couldn't agree more.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 3:44 PM alicexbt via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Note: This email is an opinion and not an attack on bitcoin
>
> Covenants on bitcoin will eventually be implemented with a soft fork. CTV
> is the
