Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, May 26th, 2022 at 12:34, AdamISZ via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> Hi Jonas, list,
> responses inline
>
> >
> > [0] https://github.com/jonasnick/bips/pull/25
>
>
> Right, thanks, will follow up.
>
Just to drop a note to
List denizens,
As per the title, a suggested protocol for doing anti-Sybil that isn't too
demanding for the users, but actually keeps a decent level of privacy.
Notice how it's mostly focused on a user/customer of a service/product/website,
but it could conceivably useful in e.g. anti-Sybil in
Hi Peter,
> Only because the block reward goes away. If it was made to continue
> indefinitely - most likely with an inflation hard fork - demand for block
> space
> would not be critical to Bitcoin's security.
I am not completely against your proposal although 100% sure this will not have
"co
Even if demand for block space is currently not needed to pay for security
due to the block rewards, demand for BTC itself is needed for those rewards
to be worth anything.
Bitcoin, as a proof of work system, is only secure at scale. Therefore
continued growth and user adoption are both critical fo
Yes
Although I'm guessing most would agree that would be worse.
I certainly would choose to add fee generating features over inflation
Probably most other people would too
On Sat, Jun 11, 2022, 11:36 PM Peter Todd wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 09:02:18AM -0400, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin
