Re: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay

2022-10-08 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 12:58:35PM -0700, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > > Protocol cannot be defined on an ad-hoc basis as a "courtesy" > > BIPs are a courtesy in the first place. > I suppose if you felt that you were the authority then this would be your > perspective. You seem to

Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Opt-in full-RBF] Zero-conf apps in immediate danger

2022-10-08 Thread alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
Hi Dario, There aren't any risks with latest release of bitcoin core. However its not just munn or other things mentioned, even other bitcoin projects could be affected if [#25600][1] is merged. Anyway I cannot comment anymore, neither in the PR or repository. I tried my best. Peter Todd has

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay

2022-10-08 Thread Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev
> From: Anthony Towns > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:32:29PM -0700, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > Protocol cannot be defined on an ad-hoc basis as a "courtesy" > > BIPs are a courtesy in the first place. I suppose if you felt that you were the authority then this would be your

[bitcoin-dev] Refreshed BIP324

2022-10-08 Thread Dhruv M via bitcoin-dev
Hi all, We have refreshed the proposal for BIP324, a new bitcoin P2P protocol featuring opportunistic encryption, a mild bandwidth reduction, and the ability to negotiate upgrades before exchanging application messages. We'd like to invite community members to review the BIP[1] and the related