Hi list,
After I have been asked offline the exact date when those meetings were
actually starting, I'm proposing Tuesday 15th November at 18:00 UTC, i.e 2
weeks from now. Thinking about a monthly frequency for now (from my
experience attending dlcspecs/lighnting specs meetings/core dev meetings
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 06:21:08PM +0100, yancy via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
> Protocol Devs,
>
> After reading through this email thread and BIP125, I'm curious if non-rbf
> nodes will relay full-rbf transactions and vice versa. That is to say, if
> only one non-rbf node exists on the network,
Protocol Devs,
After reading through this email thread and BIP125, I'm curious if
non-rbf nodes will relay full-rbf transactions and vice versa. That is
to say, if only one non-rbf node exists on the network, however, every
other node implements full-rbf, will the transaction still be
Thanks for your full thoughts Suhas,
The idea of V3 is that we're currently leaving fees on the table by
allowing use-cases to be pinned, not that we like Lightning and we think
miners should stop being profit maximizing somehow to enable safer/better
layer 2 systems.
If someone wants to bump
AJ,
Thanks for the thoughtful post. I think your observations about how we view
mempool policy in the Bitcoin Core project, and how that seems to be
changing in the discussions around `-mempoolfullrbf`, are on-point and
provide a helpful baseline for considering future policy changes.
For a long
